Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home
Opinions Search
EAB Decisions Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-140 Charges (PUB. REVIEW)
LAEthics
>
Public Access Charges
>
SearchableCharges
>
2020
>
2020-140 Charges (PUB. REVIEW)
Metadata
Thumbnails
New Search
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2025 12:17:38 PM
Creation date
4/14/2021 2:57:51 PM
Metadata
2020-140 Charges (PUB. REVIEW)
Fields
Template:
Charges Item
Type of Document
Charges Issued
DocketNumber
2020-140
Parties Involved
Jeffery Lirette
Agency at Issue
Houma Police Department
Meeting Date
4/8/2021
Law
42:1111A
42:1112A
Caption
Charges issued against Jeffery Lirrette concerning his receipt of funds that he was not duly entitled to receive in connection with his employment with the Houma Police Department.
Ethics Subject Matters
Payment - Not Duly Entitled
Participation
Date Published
4/20/2021 12:00:00 AM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
purchase the drug and to pay the confidential informant. Mr. Lirette then took the requested cash <br /> from the lockbox and handed it to the requesting officer. Once the controlled buy occurred (i.e., <br /> the confidential informant successfully purchased the drug using the division's cash), the officer <br /> brought the confidential informant back to the HPD office and completed a Confidential Informant <br /> form ("CI form"), on which the CI placed his or her fingerprints using a wet-ink pad. On these CI <br /> forms, the officers wrote the date and time of the C1 purchase and payment, the type and amount <br /> of drug purchased, and the total amount of cash used. The officers were then responsible for <br /> attaching their case reports to the completed, corresponding CI form and signing the form. The <br /> officers were also expected to reference the case report number on the corresponding CI form. <br /> 9. <br /> Forty-five (45) CI forms were altered, fabricated, or forged by Jeffery Lirette during the <br /> time period of June 21, 2016 through March 13, 2019. The forty-five (45) CI forms and the case <br /> reports showed the following: (1) the amount of cash and/or drug purchased as listed on the CI <br /> form differed from the amount and drug stated in the case report narratives (2) the case report <br /> referenced on the CI form did not involve the controlled purchase of drugs; (3) the CI number <br /> referenced on the CI form differed from the CI number stated in the case report; (4) previously <br /> completed CI forms were altered and copied;or(5)case report narratives for previously completed <br /> CI forms were copied and attached to fabricated CI forms. Jeffery Lirette also signed CI forms in <br /> his own name, signifying that he received petty cash for his own controlled buys. <br /> 10. <br /> On at least seventeen(17) CI forms, Mr. Lirette forged Officer Correy Beal's signature on <br /> the forms. Mr. Lirette also forged Officers Kristina Payne's and Corey Duplantis' signatures on <br /> CI forms as well. <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.