Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home
Charges Search
EAB Decisions Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-882 (2)
LAEthics
>
Opinions
>
SearchableOpinions
>
2022
>
2021-882 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
New Search
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2024 8:37:59 AM
Creation date
4/11/2022 11:56:31 AM
Metadata
2021-882 (2)
Fields
Template:
Opinion Item
Opinion Type
Advisory Opinion
Docket Number
2021-882(b)
Requesting Party
Paul D. Escott
Agency at Issue
Lafayette Parish Planning & Zoning Commission
Decision Date
4/8/2022
Law
1113B
1123(34)
Caption
Advisory opinion regarding the application of R.S. 42:1123(34) to members of the Lafayette Parish Planing & Zoning Commission.
Ethics Subject Matters
Prohibited Transactions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parish Commission has a substantial economic interest, from submitting, or being any way inter- <br /> ested in,an application for approval of a preliminary plat for the development of commercial prop- <br /> erty located in Lafayette Parish, but outside of the corporate limits of the City of Lafayette. <br /> QUESTION 7 <br /> Whether the Code would prohibit a real estate development company, in which an appointed Parish <br /> Commission member is a part owner, from requesting approval of a preliminary plat for the devel- <br /> opment or rezoning of commercial property in in the City of Lafayette to the Lafayette City Plan- <br /> ning & Zoning Commission? <br /> A company, in which an appointed member of the Parish Commission has a substantial economic <br /> interest,would not be prohibited by 1113B from applying for preliminary plat approval or rezoning <br /> of commercial property to the Lafayette City Planning&Zoning Commission as those transactions <br /> are not under the supervision or jurisdiction of the Parish Commission. <br /> QUESTION 8 <br /> Whether the Code would prohibit an appointed Parish Commission member from applying to the <br /> Board of Zoning Adjustment for a variance on commercial property located in the City of Lafa- <br /> yette? The Board of Zoning Adjustment is a separate entity from the Parish Commission. <br /> An appointed member of the Parish Commission would not be prohibited by 1113B from applying <br /> for a variance on commercial property with the Board of Zoning Adjustment, as that transaction is <br /> not under the supervision or jurisdiction of the Parish Commission. <br /> QUESTION 9 <br /> Whether a prohibited transaction under 1113B would be cured by the recusal of the appointed <br /> Parish Commission member? <br /> The Board concluded that recusal as to an application that does not meet the requirements of <br /> 1123(34) does not cure a potential violation of the Code. <br /> QUESTION 10 <br /> Whether the Code would require an appointed member of the Parish Commission to resign from <br /> their public position to avoid a potential violation of the Code? <br /> The Board noted that the Code does not require resignation. Instead, an appointed member can <br /> choose not to undertake the conduct which would be a violation of the Code. However, if an ap- <br /> pointed member of the Parish Commission chooses to resign in an attempt to prevent a potential <br /> violation of any provision of the Code,the post-employment restrictions of the Code will apply. If <br /> a member has a question as to the application of these provisions to transactions with their former <br /> agency, they should seek an advisory opinion on the issue. <br /> Page 5 of 6 (BD 2021-882B) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.